Washington State Health Board met today over zoom to discuss a number of subjects, but two were high on the priority list for many citizens of Washington: Adding the COVID injection to the “required” vaccines for public school students, and the ability of local health department officials to use law enforcement to enforce quarantines.

For now, it appears they are not going to push the COVID injections onto the “required” jabs for going to public school as the Board unanimously voted against recommending its addition to the list.

They did not rule out further discussion and/or decision, instead stating they needed to look at further research and data to make a determination. Several Board members seemed to be moved by the massive public outcry by claiming to have read all of the comments posted by citizens.

The morning started with presentations about data related to the COVID jab ranging from numbers of the injected to those hospitalized, with no mention of alternative treatments. During the opening presentation, they blamed the lack of COVID injections on a lack of culturally appropriate materials in some communities.

One of the board members said that the COVID injection has longer lasting protection for COVID than natural immunity.

Then, they turned to the public comment.

Chairman Keith Grellner stated that 7500 citizens were lined up online to comment. The agenda only allowed for fifty minutes. After going twenty minutes beyond the fifty minute allotment, only thirty-three of the 7500 were able to speak. All thirty-three where clearly against any mandates or forced quarantines. A large portion of the hour and ten minute public comment was taken up by technical issues as twenty-five people were called on and were not able to speak for unknown reasons. Many were simply cut off at the one minute mark. No mention was made concerning how the order of speakers was determined.

One of the speakers pointed out the difference between “relative risk reduction” and “absolute risk reduction,” which accounts for the largely misleading “95% effective” claim. A woman stated that it was “appalling” that a law even exists that would allow a health department official to use police to detain anyone. One man said he couldn’t wait for the “crimes against humanity trials” to begin. A woman from Informed Choice Washington discussed the lack of clinical trials in several areas of toxicity. Many people simply stated their opposition to the mandates, and how it was hurting business. Several cited the VAERS vaccine death toll connected to the COVID injection that has topped 20,000 deaths. A very angry woman from Spokane told the Board they “should be ashamed” of themselves for what they were doing. A woman named “Lesko Brannon” was allowed to speak her opposition to the mandates as well.

The Chairman adjourned for lunch after noting they had gone twenty minutes over time. They took no questions from the public.

After lunch, the WAC 246-100 was discussed. The presentation was a consideration of lowering the penalty for HIV positive people knowingly exposing someone else without their knowledge was recommended to be reduced to a misdemeanor. They also discussed how the Board could facilitate destigmatizing HIV-positive people. The Chairman made point to mention that this discussion was not about forced quarantines stated in WAC 246-100-040. Then, public comment was opened up again.

Twenty-three people were allowed to speak, and all but three of them went “off topic” to discuss vaccine mandates and forced quarantine. The obviously irritated Chairman warned the speakers twice about staying on topic and finally cut the public comment short when his orders were not followed.

Of the people who commented, at least two mentioned that the Board seemed more concerned with the “stigma” of HIV-positive people than the the discrimination against those who have not taken the COVID injection. Another speaker stated “HIV and COVID have one thing in common… Anthony Fauci” and pointed out that the CDC is not a government agency, merely a private corporation headquartered in Atlanta.

Once the public comment was ended, one of the board members called citizens “crazy” over concern against mandatory quarantine centers that the Chairman said do not exist, and that the Board has no part in making anything mandatory.

No one on the Board addressed the Unconstitutional nature of WAC 246-100-040. Nor did they discuss the correlation between quarantine camps being implemented in Washington with publicly posted jobs for “strike teams” to staff them. They also did not mention how states like New York are voting on similar provision to detain COVID positive people.

Chairman Grellner stated that WAC 246-100-040 was created in 2003, and wanted the public to know that he has never heard of forced detention being used outside of TB sanitariums in the 50s and 60s. Another Board member felt sorry that so many were caused undue stress for “misinformation.”

Vice Chairman Dr. Pendergrass expressed how great their advisory committee was on two occasions citing its make-up from many agencies and “regular” citizens, how they have turned one vaccine down in the past, and how they use “data” to make decisions.

They continued to insist they have no part in vaccine mandates.

I would listen on an empty stomach.